‏The Hypocrisy of Critics of The Islamic State

‏The Hypocrisy of Critics of The Islamic State

Critics of Islamic state are divided into two categories. the first category is What I call "Atheistic View" or "Humanistic View" their main argument or criticism against Islamic State is -as they say -  the extreme violence, brutality bloodthirsty ,deprivation,  total barbarism ...etc of the Islamic State toward its enemy ( one must admit they are creative when it comes to naming the actions of  Islamic State ) ,this argument -for an alien who has just arrived to earth- seems justifiable  and has a solid base and anyone who looks through their goggles would reach the same conclusion, but I see it as an unjustifiable ,baseless and I would say rather childish argument, in war humans kill each other be it by hand, knives,  bullets,  or  bombs, etc,it isn't important  how your enemy dies, the important thing is to be sure that he is dead, war is about killing, though it would be nice to have- as in video games- a god mod or a second live but in reality you have only one shot. Islamic State is at war with more than 60 countries led by the USA, who bombing its territory. days and nights with thousands tons of bombs,  killing thousands of boys and girls , men and women ,destroying homes and hospitals ,giving support to its enemy on the ground who commit massacre after massacre, all this and what do you expect from Islamic State, to thank USA or beg it for mercy, no Islamic State has to (I would say must) slaughter without mercy every one who is found guilty of fighting them, spying or helping by any means its enemy,  that's justifiable ,that's what one should do to defend himself and those who under his protection, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that,doesn’t matter  that's a struggle for existence, either me or you, there isn't any middle ground.and why it's barbarity to  slaughter your enemy but it isn’t a barbarity to kill him by a bullet or a bomb or a rocket , killing is killing if you have a problem with killing then don't blame us blame humanity.

from the dawn of humanity war is an essential part of our existence and our progress, grow up and see reality don't live in Hollywood movie where the hero in order to save a child kills the whole city.

The Atheistic View divided into two groups, the first group is the politicians. intellectuals and journalists,who have a total control of Media which in turn have a total control of the second groups The Masses who are just like parrots ,what the Media say they repeat it blindly, if Media say Daech is a terror group ,so be it ,Daech is a terror group, The Masses has no real influence in this war except for going into demonstrations to show their support to what Media telling them to support, so the politicians leading this war by manipulating  the Masses through the Media,and this is the democracy's final stage, a minority controlling the majority through a mass brainwash, a real pity.

The Atheistic View which seems consistent with its convictions. but in reality they are just a bunch of hypocrites .they say that Islamic State isn't representing the TRUE Islam and Islam is about peace and mercy and blah blah blah, and they call for Muslim to stand against Islamic State and its representation of Islam.they define Islam they way they want Islam to be,  Islam without Jihad without teeth and nails,  so to be easy for them to  loot and subjugate Muslims.

The second category is the Religious View which divided into three groups, the first one is the ruling oligarch whether  kings Emirs,Presidents ...etc who have a bunch of self proclaimed intellectuals and religious leaders (Ulama, Sheikhs,Imams),they also have a total control of media that has a total control of the Masses who are parroting what it says,the religious leader knowing that Islamic State and its actions are in total confirm with Islamic Sharia and they can't attack Islamic State from this side they borrow the Atheistic's view and incorporated it into their propaganda, by doing that the religious leader fell into a huge contradiction ,as they represent themselves as " Guardians of Sharia" but in the same time attack the very foundation of it. that makes their position very awkward and more of a mess ,but through media everything is possible.the third group is a minority who sees Islam as more of cultural phenomenon. they oppose -blatantly- the application of Sharia and call for more  reformation of Islam to make it more suitable for modern times, this group has a little influence and therefore their criticism has not much of importance.

also on this category the ruling minority leading the war against the Islamic State by manipulating the Masses through media.

In conclusion, Islamic State has the right and legitimacy to defend itself by any means necessary as long as it doesn’t contradict the Sharia which is the very cause of reestablishing the Khilafa.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------